Does Donald Trump’s victory mean the end of Climate Action in the United States?
Does it mean the end of the Paris Accord?
Does it really mean that half of the American people think that Climate Change is a hoax?
I don’t know about the first two, but I can’t believe people who voted for Trump don’t understand that Climate Change is a thing that we have to do something about.
Some of them, maybe…
I suspect they are mostly sick of having it pushed in their faces as if its their individual problem to solve.
Leanne and I can relate.
At this stage in our renovation and retrofit we’re just trying to finish enough of the house so that the building inspector will let us occupy it and we can get homeowner’s insurance again.
We’d like to spend Christmas in our house for a change instead of next door.
I haven’t been writing the blog because I simply don’t have energy at the end of the day. Weekdays I wake up early to make lunches for the kids, teach a class til noon, pick the kids up from school, and then work on the house til dinner time. Leanne works full-time and keeps up the electrical work with our electrician and her Dad. On weekends its all house all the time.
If this is what it takes for average folks to fight climate change, its no wonder we’re the exception, not the rule. My Eco-Warrior Badge is heavy.
Trump often railed against “the Mainstream Media”. Apparently, it struck a chord. Maybe when you are struggling to eek out a living and the media reports that climate change is the single greatest threat we face, it’s a little hard to swallow.
The truth is that the media have been under-reporting climate change. There is no confusion among scientists, researchers, NASA, the UN and everyone else who has looked at it for ten minutes but nobody seems to have any solutions besides buy more eco-friendly stuff.
One problem is that most mainstream news is delivered in a context of commercialism. Every story is steeped in commercials for stuff we don’t need and the solution for climate change is presented in products. Buy a more expensive car to reduce emissions. Replace lightbulbs, shop local, buy organic. The market has consumed environmentalism as an opportunity to sell more stuff and that has made everybody cynical.
CBC radio had a story on today about some people who say that Canada should reconsider its commitment to introduce a carbon tax.
Wrong! A carbon tax is precisely the kind of tool we need!
The BC example has been good for the economy while reducing greenhouse gases. It provides incentives for communities to take climate action which takes the pressure off the individual consumer who is already wracked with guilt for buying a new…anything.
What will happen if the US stops taking action on climate change? Will Canada’s economy suffer?
Can I answer that question with a question? Can we stop thinking about the profits of large corporations as if their well-being is more important than anything else for a second?
The Natural Resources minister under Stephen Harper, Joe Oliver was on the radio programme I was listening to. He was so full of misinformation I was yelling at the radio.
One thing he said was that the best way to fight climate change is to push forward in science and technology so that cheaper and better ways to solve the problem come into the market.
Sound reasonable? It’s hogwash. What makes me angry is that he is in a position to know better. All the best information was at his fingertips, but he continues to soothe the shopping public with the message that we can keep doing what we’re doing until technology fixes everything.
One of the biggest lessons we have learned as we work to make our home as energy-efficient as possible is that technology is not the issue.
The technology and techniques have been around a long time and they are so simple that most people can understand easily:
- Insulate your house
- Insulate your house some more
- Insulate your house to the point where people look at what you’re doing and say, “holy crap that’s a lot of insulation”
- seal your house (doors, windows, chimneys, vents…)
- ventilate your house (you need fresh air now that you sealed it so well) with a Heat-Recovery Ventilator
Now that you have done all that you should not need very much heat in the winter nor cooling in the summer. Now you can decide how you want to provide that little bit of heating and cooling. (Hint: try not to use fossil fuels, including Natural Gas)
Here are a few fun options for heating your house without emitting GHGs: an air-source heat pump, a ground-source heat pump or a sun-pump.
SPOILER ALERT: Leanne and I have decided to deliver heat in the house with water pipes under the floors (and radiators on the top floor) and heat that water with electricity. We’re eschewing a heat pump for the time being but we may be able to partially heat the water with solar panels.
Yes, there are best-practices and some gadgets which help with all this, but the technology is available.
The problem is that not enough people are doing it.
Why are solar panels expensive?
Not enough people are buying them.
Why is it so hard to find a contractor who knows how to retrofit a house?
Not enough people are doing it.
Why does it take so long to retrofit a house?
Not enough people are doing it.
Does this cycle right back to blaming the public for not taking action? No. How can we expect the 99% of people who are not rich to spend a year and a lot of money retrofitting their house when the return on investment will be at least a decade away?
So, let’s not blame the media for ringing the climate bell without offering solutions. The solutions have to come from the people we elected to manage our future. Unfortunately, I don’t think Donald Trump has any solutions and I pray that Canada stays strong and doesn’t get sucked into the past.
Til next time,